I use Grammarly’s plagiarism checker because I hate to echo someone else’s thoughts in my blog unintentionally. This is my blog for my thoughts and opinions, not someone else’s (except in the comments).
Bertie Wooster (a young man about town) and his butler Jeeves (the very model of the modern manservant)βreturn in their first new novel in nearly forty years: Jeeves and the Wedding Bells by Sebastian Faulks.
P.G. Wodehouse documented the lives of the inimitable Jeeves and Wooster for nearly sixty years, from their first appearance in 1915 (Extricating Young Gussie) to his final completed novel (Aunts Aren’t Gentlemen) in 1974. These two were the finest creations of a novelist widely proclaimed to be the finest comic English writer by critics and fans alike.
Forty years later, Bertie and Jeeves return in a hilarious affair of mix-ups and mishaps. With the approval of the Wodehouse estate, acclaimed novelist Sebastian Faulks brings these two back to life for their legion of fans.
Bertie, nursing a bit of heartbreak over the recent engagement of one Georgina Meadowes to someone not named Wooster, agrees to help his old friend Woody Beeching, whose own romance is foundering. That this means an outing to Dorset, away from an impending visit from Aunt Agatha, is merely an extra benefit.
Almost immediately, things go awry, and the simple plan quickly becomes complicated. Jeeves ends up impersonating one Lord Etringham, while Bertie pretends to be Jeeves’ manservant Wilberforceβ and this all happens under the same roof as the now affianced Ms. Meadowes.
~ Synopsis from Goodreads
Before starting this review, I want to state upfront that I am the hugest fan of P.G.Wodehouse. I can confidently say that I have read every book he’s written (and he’s written many) and a few more than once. Wodehouse is an author I always revert to when I need some light-hearted fun.
So how does a book claiming to be an homage to P.G.Wodehouse fare?
Surprisingly, it went pretty well.
The author’s name Sebastian Faulks seemed vaguely familiar to me. A quick search through the blog archives revealed why. He has written a Bond book as well.
I went into Jeeves and the Wedding Bells with some misgivings. How can a guy who writes for Bond write for Wodehouse? The two writing styles couldn’t be more different. But here, Faulks managed to surprise me with his versatility. He got Wodehouse’s voice spot on.
Sure, there are a couple of anomalies – references to Wooster’s parents and World War 1 seem out of place in a typical Wodehousian world. But these changes to the template work quite well. Wooster comes across as more human and less of a caricature, and I liked Wooster 2.0 very, very much indeed.
If there is a place this book falters a bit, it is in the story. A good Wodehouse plot is highly convoluted, with numerous threads that must be tied neatly at the end.
However, this book’s plot is simple and untangled easily without Jeeves having to tax his intellect too much.
Despite this deficiency, I liked the book a lot. It’s hilarious where it should be while at the same time adding a little something (emotions! back story!) to the Wodehouse formula.
In short, this is a surprisingly good homage that I recommend to Wodehouse lovers who need a bit of light and sunshine.
Thanks to Penguin Random House for sending this book in exchange for an honest review.
Disclosure
Grammarly has sponsored this post. All opinions and ideas expressed here are my own.
Thank you for giving your recommendations to a PG Wodehouse fan.You writing is effortless and makes enjoyable reading… Thanks once again.
@Rajeev Moothedath:disqus You’re welcome, Rajeev. Thanks for visiting and commenting, and the kind words π
Nish, that’s one more reason to like your blog ! I too am a huuuuuge fan of Wodehouse. Now that you’ve given your stamp of approval, I look forward to reading this book π
@The Greedy Reader: Do try it and let me know how you like it π