Tag Archives: Stieg Larsson

The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo by Stieg Larsson

Trailer for The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo is Here

I always thought I’d give this movie a skip – difficult to stomach the rape and torture scenes I know will be there, but this trailer is tempting me to reconsider…

I think the trailer looks awesome, the casting inspired, am pretty sure the movie is going to be terrific. What do you think? And doesn’t the soundtrack rock?

Forced to post a link here as wordpress.com seems to have an issue embedding MSN videos, but seriously…this trailer rocks. Go watch. And if you haven’t read the book by Stieg Larsson, which rock have you been hiding under? See my glowing review here and then go pick yourself a copy.

Update: Managed to embed the video finally using the instructions here:

http://en.support.wordpress.com/videos/vodpod/

About these ads

The Girl who Kicked the Hornet’s Nest – A Review

The Girl who Kicked the Hornet's Nest

The Girl who Kicked the Hornet's Nest

At last I am done with the Millenium trilogy. It took me a year to complete. I blame that partly on the 1st book, which ties up all the events in the story quite neatly. So, while I loved the book, I didn’t also feel the burning need to know what happens further. However, once I finished book 2 – The Girl who Played with Fire, I just had to read the final book to know how events play out.

The Girl who Kicked the Hornet’s Nest continues the Lizbeth Salander story. She is now lying helpless in a hospital bed. She is accused of manslaughter charges, and she has powerful enemies lining up against her. Thankfully, her faithful (and resourceful) friends Blomqvist, Armansky, and Palmgren are working together to expose the Sapo and the nasty elements there.

The book finally ends in a high-octane trial that really exposes the flaws in Swedish democracy and provides Salander the long-delayed justice she deserves.

How does this book hold up to the rest of the books?

I liked this book, but I can’t say I loved it. It’s slower than books one and two. Considering that the book is essentially a continuation of book 2, it takes a couple of hundred pages for the book to come to a slow boil. By this time, I was getting quite impatient with all the waffling. Just wished Larsson would get to the point faster.

I did appreciate the way Larsson builds the case for Salander. Blomqvist and his friends uncover one proof after another to bury the bad guys.

However, I was surprised that one key/interesting witness possibility was overlooked by both the prosecution and the defense. I am of course referring to Camilla Salander – Lizbeth’s twin sister. She was just an intriguing name mentioned in The Girl who Played with Fire, and I was expecting (and hoping) that she would play a bigger role in this book. But unfortunately, that is not the case. And it’s pretty disappointing because I was really interested to know what Lizbeth’s twin was like. There are a few hints dropped that she is quite opposite to Lizbeth – supposed to be very pretty and very manipulative. How great would it have been to see the two sisters pitted against each other during the trial sequences.

I suppose that she was due to play a bigger role in later books, but of course Larsson’s death means that we can only speculate.

Another aspect of the book that I loved were these wonderful snippets about women warriors through history that are peppered throughout the book at the start of each section:

But from antiquity to modern times, there are many stories of female warriors, of Amazons. The best known find their way into the history books as warrior queens, rulers as well as leaders. They have been forced to act as any Churchill, Stalin, or Roosevelt: Semiramis from Nineveh, who shaped the Assyrian Empire, and Boudicca, who led one of the bloodiest English revolts against the Roman forces of occupation, to cite just two. Boudicca is honoured with a statue on the Thames at Westminster Bridge, right opposite Big Ben. Be sure to say hello to her if you happen to pass by.

Or

The historian Diodorus from Sicily, 100 B.C. (who is regarded as an unreliable source by other historians), describes the Amazons of Libya, which at that time was a name used for all of north Africa west of Egypt. This Amazon reign was a gynaecocracy, that is, only women were allowed to hold high office, including in the military. According to legend, the realm was ruled by a Queen Myrina, who with thirty thousand female soldiers and three thousand female cavalry swept through Egypt and Syria and all the way to the Aegean, defeating a number of male armies along the way. After Queen Myrina finally fell in battle, her army scattered.

I guess I like these little snippets because they give some insight into Larsson’s mind. He seems to be a staunch feminist, and who cannot love a writer who promotes a woman as a figure of strength?

This book was even more relatable considering the wikileaks Assange saga that is playing out in the media today. Some hacktivists (hacker activists) launched Denial of Service attacks against banks and credit card companies to protest against Assange’s arrest. It was rather a weird feeling following this news when I was reading a very similar plotline in the book.

Maybe fact and fiction are a lot closer than we make them out to be!

All in all, I love the Millennium trilogy. Sure, it’s pulp fiction, the translations are a little wordy, but still enjoyable. I will however be giving the movies a miss. I can stand reading about rape and torture and violence. Seeing them enacted on screen is an entirely different matter!

And the winner is…

Drumroll…

Cass from Words on Paper. Cass wins a copy of The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo by Stieg Larsson.

I am wondering whether that is suitable reading material for a 17-year old. Hmm…maybe I should ask random.org to pick a number again…

Haha, just kidding! Congratulations, Cass! I will be getting in touch with you to get the address details.

And thanks everyone for the enthusiastic participation :)

Things are Starting to Look up…

This saturday I finished my final session of physiotherapy and finally got off my medication for all my RSI and back-related issues. It feels really cool but really odd at the same time. I started exercising with baby weights of 1kg each, and it just felt so weird! Normally, I would have been able to do those exercises in my sleep. But, now I am starting from scratch again – feel like a toddler trying to walk without helping hands :) – that’s the closest analogy I can give to what I am feeling right now.

I have also kickstarted my running, and am glad to know that my running stamina and speed has not gone away. Starting my exercise routine, I hope will also banish the low-level depression that has been humming away in my brain for the past 6 weeks. The medications I was taking made me feel dull, sluggish, and ravenously hungry. Not a very nice feeling!

In addition, we got some good news today, that we were anxiously expecting for the last 2 months. This good news comes just in time to help us plan some fun stuff that we have in the offing. I know I am sounding unnecessarily mysterious, but I have been hoping for this to happen for so long that i don’t want to reveal any plans in advance and jinx them.

On the reading front, I zipped through The Girl who Kicked the Hornet’s Nest by Stieg Larsson. I enjoyed the book, but yes, it could have done with some editing. A detailed review will be coming up shortly.

Well, that’s all my updates for now! Back to the ever increasing pile of work on my head. Have to make up for some of the time lost when I was working at a much slower pace.

Working at Double-speed

Working at Double-speed

The Girl who Played with Fire – A Book Review

The Girl who Played with Fire

The Girl who Played with Fire

I am convinced this book is wrongly named. Lisbeth Salander the protagonist is definitely not the girl who plays with fire – she is fire.

This book is the second in the Millennium series written by Stieg Larsson. I have reviewed the first book here.

While the first book introduces Salander as a character, this one goes in-depth into her troubled past, and the reasons why she is the way she is. The mystery is Salander itself.

Book Synopsis WITHOUT SPOILERS:

Mikail Blomqvist and another reporter from Millennium magazine are investigating a story on sex-trafficking – young girls are being brought from Eastern Europe, and forced into prostitution. This investigation threatens to bring down many high-ranking Swedish officials who are involved directly or indirectly in this trade.

Unknown to Mikail Blomqvist (the hero from the first novel), the investigation touches upon Lisbeth Salander’s past with whom he is no longer in touch.

When the journalist doing the primary research on this story is murdered, suspicion falls upon Salander. Blomqvist believing her innocent, starts his own investigation into what really happened.

My review WITH SPOILERS:

First off, I have to say I loved this book. It was fast-paced, gripping, with just the right amount of thrills. That said, it’s not perfect. Heck! anything rarely is!

However, one major plot point seems outrageously weak to me. It was hard for me to believe that the Swedish Secret Police (Sapo) would work so hard to maintain and protect Zalachenko (a Russian secret service agent who defected to Sweden) long past his use/value to Sweden. Even when he becomes a complete embarrassment, he is protected by them. Why? How much easier would it have been to kill and dispose him of quietly? No one would have made any fuss about it. If Salander could find and track him so easily, then it should have been a cakewalk for the Sapo. The addition of a James Bondesque villain (a giant man who is incapable of feeling pain) also brings down the standard of the book.

Apart from these issues, I did not find any flaws in the book. I even liked the mundane details of Salander’s life – the shopping in Ikea, her standard diet of Billy’s Pan Pizza. Those details showed just how isolated and lonely her life was.

I am rather puzzled at the inclusion of the character of Paulo Roberto (a
non-fictional boxer) who plays a minor role in the book. His role in the story is not at all relevant, and nothing would have been lost from the book, if his part in the story was not included. Anybody have any ideas why he has been included in the book?

If you close your thoughts to the above voices of reason, and if you loved Salander from the first book, you will love this book wholeheartedly.

Note: I am including this book towards the Orbis Terrarrum reading challenge.

My First Tag of 2010

My reading efforts and my life in general has been pretty lacklustre of late. Nothing eventful to blog about. Couple of weeks back, the snubnose was down with pneumonia. In the ensuing worry, leave from office, and so on, I have had to do some massive catch-up with work, and it is not over yet.

I have also had to slow down completely halt my reading of Bleak House. I stopped reading when the snubnose fell ill, and I have just not been motivated enough to pick it up (or even any other book) again. Strange for me! I must really be feeling the blues…

Anyway, I saw this interesting meme on Mae’s blog, and I liked the questions enough to take part myself. So, without much ado, here we go:

  1. Favorite childhood book?
    If it was early childhood, I would agree with Mae and list The Magic Faraway Tree by Enid Blyton. By the time I was ten though, I was headlong in love with Robert Louis Stevenson … in particular Treasure Island and Black Arrow.
  2. What are you reading right now?
    Bleak House by Charles Dickens
  3. What books do you have on request at the library?
    None
  4. Bad book habit?
    Spilling food/water/tea on my books. I always munch when I read.
  5. What do you currently have checked out at the library?
    Bleak House by Charles Dickens, and Gulliver’s Travels by Jonathan Swift. I am on a classics kick now.
  6. Do you have an e-reader?
    I have an iPad, and I do use iBooks for reading.
  7. Do you prefer to read one book at a time, or several at once?Strictly one book at a time.
  8. Have your reading habits changed since starting a blog?
    I pay more attention to the book, I think…I note down sections that I like. I make the effort to check up certain facts mentioned in the book to see how accurate they are. Basically, blogging has made me a more conscientious reader…or that’s what I’d like to think :) .
  9. Least favorite book you read this year (so far)?
    That’s easy…Witch & Wizard by James Patterson
  10. Favorite book you’ve read this year?
    The Brothers Karamazov by Dostoyevsky comes close, but I have to admit that my favorite book was The Story of Edgar Sawtelle by David Wroblewski. I love books with dogs.
  11. How often do you read out of your comfort zone?
    A lot. I love variety when it comes to books.
  12. What is your reading comfort zone?
    There are some authors – unfortunately most of them dead who always do it for me. My favorite authors I turn to are Agatha Christie, Georgette Heyer, and Victoria Holt (gothic romances). Generally, any well-written mystery with a dash of romance will do the trick for me.Of the living authors, I think Sophie Kinsella is creeping up on me.
  13. Can you read on the bus?
    Nope…not on bus, train, airplane…nothing. I tend to fall asleep when the vehicle is in motion.
  14. Favorite place to read?
    Sofa
  15. What is your policy on book lending?
    I have no problems with it…no problems when it is not returned either…I just go ahead and buy a new copy if it is a book I particularly like. I generally bargain hunt a lot while book shopping, so monetarily also it’s not a huge loss.
  16. Do you ever dog-ear books?
    All the time. I am not precious with books ever…my dad keeps complaining about how he knows exactly which books in his massive collection that I have read just by the number of dog-ears!
  17. Do you ever write in the margins of your books?
    Never…my dad would kill me if I ever did that.
  18. Not even with text books?
    OK, that I do…
  19. What is your favorite language to read in?
    English. I can read Hindi and French, but it’s really a struggle. I’d just cave in and read a really good translation. I do wish that I could read Bengali. Kal’s blog with its frequent references to Tagore’s poetry and books makes me wish that I could read them in the original language. Our Indian languages are extremely rich…something always gets lost while translating into English.
  20. What makes you love a book?
    It’s really hard for me to say. I think the plot must be interesting enough to span the length of the book. Some books lose out when they are needlessly long, while other books end rather abruptly. I think a well-plotted, and well-edited book regardless of the genre will always win with me. I’m being rather vague with this answer, but that’s how best I can explain it.
  21. What will inspire you to recommend a book?
    In person, I rarely recommend books. One man’s meat is another man’s poison, and I believe that strongly. Mostly friends read my blog for recommendations. Also, in real life…very few of my friends are bookish.I do sometimes recommend books to my mom, though
  22. Favorite genre?
    Thrillers and Fantasy
  23. Genre you rarely read (but wish you did?)
    Non-fiction, philosophy
  24. Favorite biography?
    Nothing in particular comes to mind. There was a mad phase when I read a bunch of stuff on the life of Marilyn Monroe. I outgrew that pretty fast. I am not very much into biographies in general.
  25. Have you ever read a self-help book?
    Ah, no…I read strictly for pleasure, not to improve myself ;. Also, some of the more obnoxious people I know are heavily into the self-help style of reading, so I have always felt self-books are rather dangerous :) . Plus, I am really not that interested in knowing who moved my cheese
  26. Favorite cookbook?
    Nah…I just filch recipes off from the internet or from my favorite cooking blogs. Not that I ever actually cook them :D . They are just saved up for the time when I retire and have all the time in the world to really cook, rather than the 20-minute slap dash fare I make now.
  27. Most inspirational book you’ve read this year (fiction or non-fiction)?Inspirational? Nothing this year. Last year, I read A Thousand Splendid Suns by Khaled Hosseini and felt very inspired by the strength of the two women protagonists.
  28. Favorite reading snack?Chocolates
  29. Name a case in which hype ruined your reading experience.
    I won’t say my reading experience was ruined. Ruined is too strong a word. I will just say that I did not enjoy The Swan Thieves as much as I expected to. I don’t think the book really lived up to the hype. Not that it’s a bad book…but just overhyped. I also think the Inkworld series by Cornelia Funke was way overhyped.
  30. How often do you agree with critics about a book?
    I don’t always agree, but I like and respect the different perspectives that people bring to a book review
  31. How do you feel about giving bad/negative reviews?
    If it’s a book I bought or borrowed, I don’t have a problem with negative reviews at all. I do struggle though when authors/publishers give me bad/mediocre books to review. Then I really struggle .
  32. If you could read in a foreign language, which language would you chose?
    There are so many. I would choose French because how awesome would it be to read Victor Hugo and Alexandre Dumas in French. But, I would also choose Bengali for its rich regional literature, and Tamil – also rich in local literature, and it’s my native tongue and I can’t read it. Shame on me!!!
  33. Most intimidating book you’ve ever read?
    Mason and Dixon by Thomas Pynchon. Indecipherable and BORING. The fact that I finished it is a true tribute to my will-power and persistence.
  34. Most intimidating book you’re too nervous to begin?
    Nothing really. I don’t get intimidated…I start off and then get stuck.
  35. Favorite Poet?
    Edgar Allan Poe
  36. How many books do you usually have checked out of the library at any given time?
    4 because that’s my library’s limit.
  37. How often have you returned book to the library unread?
    Hardly ever. I’m persistent, remember ;) .
  38. Favorite fictional character?
    Current faves are Harry Bosch – the detective from the Michael Connelly series, and Vish Puri – the detective in the Tarquin Hall books.
  39. Favorite fictional villain?
    Long John Silver from Treasure Island. Also Becky Sharp from Vanity Fair.
  40. Books I’m most likely to bring on vacation?
    A book based on the place I am going to. Or, at least as close as it gets.
  41. The longest I’ve gone without reading.
    I did neglect reading during my school board exams – for about 2 years, I read nothing but textbooks. During my college years, I partied a lot and read very little. That’s the only time I can remember when books took a back seat in my life.
  42. Name a book that you could/would not finish.
    War and Peace is a book I never managed to even get halfway through, forget about finishing. I hope Bleak House does not end up in this category!
  43. What distracts you easily when you’re reading?
    Nothing, really. I tend to get engrossed. My family members get really annoyed sometimes.
  44. Favorite film adaptation of a novel?
    Lord of the Rings, and Silence of the Lambs. Generally, most thrillers make good movies as well.
  45. Most disappointing film adaptation?
    The Harry Potter movies – especially the later ones seemed to miss a lot of the richness and wonder of the books.
  46. The most money I’ve ever spent in the bookstore at one time?
    I’m quite thrifty when it comes to book buying. Mostly second-hand for me. I don’t think I have ever spent more than Rs.1000/- at any given time.
  47. How often do you skim a book before reading it?
    I don’t skim. I just go ahead and read.
  48. What would cause you to stop reading a book half-way through?
    Usually, if something much more attention-grabbing happens in real life, and I end up having to stop reading, or if it is blah, blah, blah like War and Peace.
  49. Do you like to keep your books organized?
    Yes, Organizing my book shelf is actually a comforting activity for me. Though, I always end up leaving it half-finished and starting on some book that has caught my interest there :D
  50. Do you prefer to keep books or give them away once you’ve read them?
    I would keep some – the ones I loved, the author-signed ones, etc. The others I wouldn’t mind giving away.
  51. Are there any books you’ve been avoiding?
    I am avoiding books 2 and 3 of the Stieg Larsson series and the Hunger Games trilogy. I want to take my time and read those books long after the blogosphere chatter has died down, and I am no longer as influenced by the hype.
  52. Name a book that made you angry.
    I think the sloppy writing on The Dangerous Days of Daniel X made me very angry. My book review also reflects that I think :)
  53. A book you didn’t expect to like but did?
    I expect to like most books, that’s why I read them :D
  54. A book that you expected to like but didn’t?
    I know I am flogging a dead horse here, but I really expected to like Twilight and the rest of the books in the series. I find vampire fiction fun as a rule, but these books were damp squibs.
  55. Favorite guilt-free, pleasure reading?
    Agatha Christie, Georgette Heyer, Victoria Holt

Whew! I finally finished this meme. Anybody else want to take it up? Go on, do it, and then link to me after :)

Year End Book Meme

I first saw this meme at Aimee’s blog, which she picked up from Lorielle and I think it’s a nice way to look back at the books read during the year and try to list out THE books of the year for me.

Top 5 in 2009

Top 5 in 2009

Well, here are the books that I read and absolutely loved this year. The ones that really rocked my boat…

  1. The White Tiger by Aravind Adiga – 2008 Man Booker winner. And one of the most immoral, yet entertaining, as well as thought-provoking books I read this year.
  2. A Thousand Splendid Suns by Khaled Hosseini – a book that will make you laugh, cry, angry, indignant, and yes thankful and hopeful. This book touched me in so many ways, I just cannot explain.
  3. The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo by Stieg Larsson – just because it breaks so many perceptions about crime thrillers. It is so much more than just a murder mystery. And it left me so looking forward to reading the other 2 books in this series.
  4. Books 1-4 of the Sookie Stackhouse series by Charlaine Harris – because these light reads are the most entertaining guilty reads I have read in a long while.
  5. Books 1-4 of the Septimus Heap series by Angie Sage – these books are consistently good, consistently entertaining, and really excellent reads for those times when all you want is a steaming mug of tea, and books with plenty of atmosphere, fast pace, and a dose of wry humor.

So, what were your top 5 reads in 2009?

The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo by Stieg Larsson

The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo- Book Review

The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo by Stieg Larsson

The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo by Stieg Larsson

I bought this book to gift to someone as part of the Christmas book swap going on currently. I had seen it reviewed on a few blogs, and it seemed like the perfect gift.

After I got home from the book store, I lightly read through the first couple of pages, and before I even knew what was happening, I was totally and completely hooked on to it. I sat up nights reading the book, kept obsessively wondering about the details, the whole works. It’s been a long time since a crime thriller had me on such tenterhooks.

I just hope the person I have gifted this to ends up enjoying it as much as I did.

What is the Book all about:

Well, it is part of a trilogy called the Millenium series (the other two books are The Girl who Played with Fire and The Girl who Kicked the Hornet’s Nest). The two main protagonists are Mikael Blomqist and Lisbeth Salander (she is the girl with the dragon tattoo). He is a financial journalist investigating a corrupt businessman’s dealings. She is a brilliant, troubled young girl almost half his age, suffering from Asperger’s? who works in an investigation agency.

When Blomqist is asked to investigate a murder that took place almost forty years ago, the two end up working together to solve the case. They also end up nailing the corrupt businessman successfully.

So, well that’s the story in a nutshell. But there is lots more to it, and it is one of those rare books that is not merely a crime thriller. In some ways, it is a commentary on present-day Swedish life. Yes, the story is based in Sweden.

My Thoughts on this Book:

I love a good edge of the seat kind of crime thriller, and so this read was right in my comfort zone. What I liked were all the small details that elevate this book from the norm.

For one, this was my first experience with any crime novel in Europe (apart from UK and Russia, that is). So, it was great to read quite a bit about a very different way of life set in a place quite unfamiliar to me.

The writing and the translation is first-class. So, is the mystery. It was awesome how Mikael and Lisbeth were able to uncover the murderer with such minimal information on their hands.

The feminist in me also loved that Lisbeth is an equal partner in the solving of this crime. She’s not just the sidekick. In fact, in many ways, she is the stronger personality who makes the decisions most of the time, and in fact saves Mikael when he takes a very rash action that gets him into deep trouble.

What intrigued me was the amount of casual sex throughout the novel; and how it does not seem to be anything out of the norm.

What I did not like was the slow ending. The mystery is solved almost three-quarters of the way into the novel, and the financial fraud case starts to take importance. The story then becomes extremely boring when they start gathering evidence to prove fraud and blah, blah, blah…I just skimmed through these sections.

That doesn’t mean I am not queuing up for books 2 and 3 in this series :)

On a parting note, here’s a nice statement that Mikael gives when he is quizzed by a journalist who claims that he caused the downfall of the Swedish economy by publishing information that disclosed the businessman’s corrupt practices. Seems very apt for today’s world, no?

You have to distinguish between two things – the Swedish economy and the Swedish stock market. The Swedish economy is the sum of all the goods and services that are produced in this country every day. There are telephones from Ericsson, cars from Volvo, chickens from Scan, and shipments from Kiruna to Skövde. That’s the Swedish economy, and it’s just as strong or weak today as it was a week ago. The Stock Exchange is something very different. There is no economy and no production of goods and services. There are only fantasies in which people from one hour to the next decide that this or that company is worth so many billions, more or less. It doesn’t have a thing to do with reality or with the Swedish economy.